FIELD NOTES / STUDIO PERSPECTIVE
What makes a space feel like it was designed for you?
19 October 2026
KPHD
What makes a space feel like it was designed for you?
For KPHD, a space feels designed for you when its details fit the visit you came to make: a clear arrival, a place to settle, light suited to the hour, and sound that supports the conversation. Ceiling height, acoustics, and the threshold are three places to begin. We treat them as design choices to test with the operator and guests, rather than a formula for making everyone feel the same.

Equator Coffees, Culver City. Photograph by Antonio Diaz, 2024.
The feeling we are after is specificity: the sense that someone considered this room and the person walking into it. A place to put a bag. A view of the host. A table where the conversation can happen without leaning across the plates.
Those are small decisions. They are also a useful design brief.
What does research tell us about a room’s effect?
Environmental research gives us ways to examine the relationship between a setting, feeling, and behavior. Albert Mehrabian and James A. Russell’s 1974 book proposed a framework relating environmental stimuli to emotional responses, including pleasure and arousal, and to behaviors such as approach. [SRC-1]
Soo Cheong (Shawn) Jang and Young Namkung later examined an extended version of that model in restaurants. Their 2009 study used structural equation modeling to examine relationships among perceived quality, emotions, and behavioral intentions. [SRC-2]
These are frameworks and findings to think with. They do not tell us that a ceiling height, a seat position, or a particular light will make every guest relax. Nor do behavioral intentions establish that a guest actually returned.
KPHD’s interpretation is practical: ask what the guest is trying to do, then examine the conditions the room offers them.
How can ceiling height support the experience?
We begin with the experience we want at each point in the room. At entry, we may want an open view and room to pause. At a table, we may want a more enclosed setting for conversation.
A lower ceiling is one possible way to frame an intimate area. A taller volume is one possible way to mark arrival. Neither is a universal prescription. We would consider the proportions alongside the light, seating, circulation, and character of the place.
The question is specific: what should happen here, and what does this part of the room need to offer?
How should sound enter the design?
For KPHD, sound belongs in the design conversation from the beginning. Name the conversation you want the room to support. Listen at the table, at the counter, and near the kitchen. Consider a busy service as well as an empty room.
Charles Spence’s 2015 review examines the role of sounds made while eating in the experience of food, including the perception of crispness and other textural qualities. [SRC-3] For us, it is a reason to think beyond the image of a meal.
Our design question is about the whole visit: can two people hear each other in the way this room intends? What sounds give the place its character, and what sounds compete with the guest or the team?
Material choices, room form, seating, and sound sources belong in that discussion. We would test the result in use, rather than assume a soft surface in one location guarantees a comfortable room.
What should happen at the threshold?
We want the guest to understand how to arrive. Look at the first sightline, the place to wait, and the route into the room.
Is the host visible? Is there room to pause without blocking service? Does a person arriving alone have somewhere to stand? These are prompts for observing a particular place, not a claim that all guests experience an entrance alike.
How can an operator turn a feeling into a brief?
Walk through the room from the street and describe what happens. Then sit in more than one place. Notice what is visible, what is audible, and what you have to work out.
Bring those observations to the designer. “The host is hard to find from the door” gives you a different starting point from “the entry needs more warmth.” Keep both if they describe the problem, but give the feeling a location.
Ask the team what they see during service. Ask guests where they feel comfortable and where the room asks them to adjust. Use their answers to test your assumptions.
For KPHD, the operator’s question and the guest’s question belong together: what does this space need to do, and what should it feel like to be here?
The room should feel like someone was expecting you. That is the design intention. The work is to make it concrete, then look carefully at whether the room delivers.
Sources & editorial note
[SRC-1] Albert Mehrabian and James A. Russell, “An Approach to Environmental Psychology,” The MIT Press, 1974 — Publisher record
[SRC-2] Soo Cheong (Shawn) Jang and Young Namkung, “Perceived quality, emotions, and behavioral intentions: Application of an extended Mehrabian-Russell model to restaurants,” Journal of Business Research 62(4), 451–460, 2009 — Author-institution record
[SRC-3] Charles Spence, “Eating with our ears: assessing the importance of the sounds of consumption on our perception and enjoyment of multisensory flavour experiences,” Flavour 4, article 3, 2015 — Publisher article
The design applications and recommendations are KPHD’s perspective. The cited research is distinguished from studio judgment and does not establish a universal formula for guest response.
The ideas are mine — lived, read, and noticed first. AI writing assistance helps me get them onto the page. — Kellie Patry